Financial Services
Four in 10 young investors think chatbots are regulated, and the regulator wants that corrected
Source: City AM, 19 Oct 2026
The Financial Conduct Authority has called on artificial intelligence providers to explain the limits of the financial information and advice their models generate, City AM reports today. Jessica Rusu of the regulator said in a speech today that the technology 'can significantly widen access to financial tools and information' but 'can also blur the boundary between regulated and unregulated activity'. The report says 40 per cent of young investors mistakenly believe chatbots are regulated by the authority, leaving them unable to get help or compensation when advice goes wrong. Rusu also criticised regulated firms for building tools that lack a defined need, exclude vulnerable consumers or have overstated capabilities.
Regulated status is the one thing a generic chatbot cannot offer, and the report suggests many customers cannot see the difference. If four in ten young investors cannot tell, authorisation is a brand asset worth stating. A disclaimer from a chatbot maker will help at the margin; a regulated firm that makes its own status visible does the work in advance. The criticism of overstated capability is a marketing point too: any claim you make about your own artificial intelligence will be read by a supervisor as well as a customer.
Say it where the advice is given: inside any artificial intelligence feature you offer, state that the service is regulated, by whom, and where a customer can complain. Then check every public claim about your own artificial intelligence tools against what they actually do, and cut those you cannot show. If you sell to regulated firms, expect governance, human oversight and monitoring to come up in the sales conversation, since the regulator named all three.