Financial Services
Bankers' personal US election donations still put Barclays and HSBC in the headline
Source: City AM, 03 Nov 2026
Staff at Barclays and HSBC have given more than $500,000 to US political candidates ahead of the midterm elections, City AM reports today, citing Federal Election Commission (FEC) data. Donors naming Barclays as their employer gave just over $344,000 since the start of last year, led by $70,000 from banking chairman Alexander Lynch to the House Victory Project, a fund split across Democratic candidates. HSBC staff gave over $163,000, led by around $18,000 from Mark Schuermann, its US head of public affairs, to the bank's political action committee (PAC).
Both banks answered carefully. Barclays called itself "politically neutral" and said staff must keep personal political activity "entirely separate" from their jobs; HSBC said its PACs are run by eligible employees, use no bank funds and aim for "an even split between parties". Both statements may be accurate. Neither changes the headline. US campaign finance rules ask donors to state their employer, so every personal cheque is filed in the public record beside the bank's name, and reporters read those records in election week. HSBC's answer is the stronger because it describes a policy rather than a disclaimer. It is also a claim journalists can test against the same data.
If your firm has a US presence, pull the FEC records for your senior people and know what they show before a journalist does. Agree a holding statement with legal and public affairs in advance, not on polling day. And brief senior executives that a personal donation filed under your firm's name is, for headline purposes, a corporate one.